🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives buried in graves at risk from shoreline retreat say that a lack of decision over how to address the problem is causing them unnecessary distress about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Ancient Churchyards

Local authorities have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Trimingham, and Mundesley as being in danger of being engulfed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the situation sets out a range of options, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure sites. Officials say it is for local people to determine how to proceed.

“At the moment we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. They wanted this to serve as their final resting place, but it won't be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could fall into the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got less than 20 years, if you consider what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident recalled a childhood visit to the nearby settlement of Eccles, which has largely disappeared into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see people’s bones,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get washed out to sea. That is not the case. People will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves looking for valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the identical fate that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be bones on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Resting Place in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline is situated the grave of a ex-soldier who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she lost sleep after discovering her child's final plot might one day be relocated.

“It does disturb me to think this won’t be his permanent resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an important site to visit.”

She believes, new interments should stop but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “What I would choose for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a tipping point has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over the timing and method to tackle the problem has resulted in grieving relatives feeling frustrated and anxious.

Some want more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for moving graves is approaching.

“The situation is very emotional,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And all parties is avoiding responsibility over who is accountable.”

A coastal manager said the burial sites were owned and managed of the church authorities. “Ultimately it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to assist them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the options. “This concerns many years before it begins getting lost.”

“Currently, there exists no unified opinion on what should be done yet. We need good community discussions to find the right answers for each village.”

The prospect of losing the churches and graveyards was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but church representatives also referenced a belief in resurrection, providing a theological perspective on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.